EPA looking to tighten SCR certification

June 17, 2011
The EPA has issued a draft guidance showing how it could tighten the requirements to certify engines and federal emissions standards

Given advances in the engineering of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) emission-control technology used on heavy-duty diesel engines, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a “draft guidance” detailing how it may tighten the requirements that must be met to certify these engines to Federal emissions standards.

EPA is requesting comments be filed on the guidance and that it will review the comments and provide final guidance on SCR at a future date. Notice of the draft guidance was published in the Federal Register for June 7th.

“The draft guidance contained in this document reflects the fact that manufacturers of heavy-duty engines and operators of trucks have gained significant experience in the design and use of SCR systems for these engines, and this experience should be

reflected in the certification process,” pointed out EPA.

The agency said, for example, that it recognizes that development of “even more robust sensors and inducements [to keep DEF levels correct] does not negate past approaches implemented pursuant to existing regulations. Rather, continual improvement is expected given the mounting experience with, and the maturing of, SCR technology, and the greater availability of DEF. As improved strategies and capabilities for proper SCR operation become feasible, EPA may guide their application to provide even further assurance that the technology is operating as intended on SCR-equipped engines”.

EPA added that it is very interested in receiving comments on four design criteria divided into these four categories within the draft guiidance:

  • Reductant tank-level driver warning system.
  • VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:26 Jun 06, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM 07JNP1 emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
  • Reductant tank-level driver inducement.
  • Identification and correction of incorrect reducing agent.
  • Tamper-resistant design

Per EPA, any party may submit written comments on this draft guidance by July 7, 2011.

Click here to read the full notice and learn how to file a comment on it.

Sponsored Recommendations

Reducing CSA Violations & Increasing Safety With Advanced Trailer Telematics

Keep the roads safer with advanced trailer telematics. In this whitepaper, see how you can gain insights that lead to increased safety and reduced roadside incidents—keeping drivers...

80% Fewer Towable Accidents - 10 Key Strategies

After installing grille guards on all of their Class 8 trucks, a major Midwest fleet reported they had reduced their number of towable accidents by 80% post installation – including...

Proactive Fleet Safety: A Guide to Improved Efficiency and Profitability

Each year, carriers lose around 32.6 billion vehicle hours as a result of weather-related congestion. Discover how to shift from reactive to proactive, improve efficiency, and...

Tackling the Tech Shortage: Lessons in Recruiting Talent and Reducing Turnover

Discover innovative strategies for recruiting and retaining tech talent in the trucking industry at our April 16th webinar, where experts will share insights on competitive pay...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!