Law firm claims quietness of hybrids poses risk

Steven J. Schwartzapfel, a partner in the New York personal injury firm of Schwartzapfel Truhowsky Marcus P.C. is putting auto and truck OEMs on notice that the of hybrid cars and trucks can be considered a higher safety risk for pedestrians and bicycle riders than gasoline- or diesel-only powered vehicles. These vehicles may provide important environmental benefits, but they cannot do so at the expense

Steven J. Schwartzapfel, a partner in the New York personal injury firm of Schwartzapfel Truhowsky Marcus P.C. is putting auto and truck OEMs on notice that the “quietness” of hybrid cars and trucks can be considered a higher safety risk for pedestrians and bicycle riders than gasoline- or diesel-only powered vehicles.

“These vehicles may provide important environmental benefits, but they cannot do so at the expense of safety,” he said, pointing to a September 2009 report by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) that found hybrid vehicles, which are typically quieter than internal combustion engine cars and trucks, can pose a greater risk to pedestrians and bicyclists.

NHTSA's study determined that hybrid electric vehicles have a higher incidence rate of pedestrian and bicyclist crashes than do models powered by internal combustion engine alone in certain vehicle maneuvers, and that these results should serve as a guide when designing future HEV/pedestrian and bicyclist crash prevention programs.

“In light of this report, hybrid manufacturers and drivers are now on notice that they need to take steps to make sure their cars are seen and heard by cyclists and pedestrians,” said Schwartzapfel. “They may be held accountable for injuries when they fail to take those steps.”

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish