Photo: Stoneridge
Fleetowner 36632 Stoneridge Mirror Replacement Camera System Truck 0
Fleetowner 36632 Stoneridge Mirror Replacement Camera System Truck 0
Fleetowner 36632 Stoneridge Mirror Replacement Camera System Truck 0
Fleetowner 36632 Stoneridge Mirror Replacement Camera System Truck 0
Fleetowner 36632 Stoneridge Mirror Replacement Camera System Truck 0

FMCSA to allow use of Stoneridge's camera system in place of mirrors

Dec. 31, 2018
FMCSA has granted Stoneridge Inc. a five-year exemption to install its camera-monitoring system on trucks instead of traditional rear-view mirrors.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has granted Stoneridge Inc. a five-year exemption to install its camera-monitoring system on trucks instead of traditional rear-view mirrors.

The company said “MirrorEye” uses integrated external digital cameras and digital monitors inside the cab. That provides an expanded field of view, full-color night vision, and the ability to continuously track the end of the trailer.

In a Federal Register posting, FMCSA said the “use of the MirrorEye system in lieu of mirrors would likely achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level of safety provided by the regulation.”

The notice also stated that Stoneridge believes the system could reduce driver fatigue “by requiring less head movement by drivers compared to the number of head movementneeded to use conventional mirrors.”

While the system is currently an aftermarket product, FMCSA’s decision could pave the way for MirrorEye and other camera systems to one day be built into new trucks.

Other companies including Daimler Trucks North America have requested exemptions to use cameras instead of mirrors. Besides safety benefits, these companies have also cited higher fuel efficiency through improved aerodynamics. 

In comments to FMCSA, truckload carriers Schneider and J.B. Hunt Transport Services said they have been using the system along with required mirrors.

Schneider said its truck drivers have "had an overwhelmingly positive experience" with the system, while J.B. Hunt wrote "we have not been involved in any collisions and have received overwhelming positive feedback from our test drivers."

However, the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance questioned whether the “technology has a proven safety benefit.” It also expressed concern whether the camera system could “undermine consistency and uniformity in compliance enforcement.”

About the Author

Neil Abt

Neil Abt, editorial director at Fleet Owner, is a veteran journalist with over 20 years of reporting experience, including 15 years spent covering the trucking industry. A graduate of American University in Washington, D.C., he began his career covering sports for The Washington Post newspaper, followed by a position in the newsroom of America Online (AOL) and then both reporting and leadership roles at Transport Topics. Abt is based out of Portland, Oregon.

Sponsored Recommendations

Tackling the Tech Shortage: Lessons in Recruiting Talent and Reducing Turnover

Discover innovative strategies for recruiting and retaining tech talent in the trucking industry at our April 16th webinar, where experts will share insights on competitive pay...

Stop Sweating Temperature Excursions

Advanced chemical indicators give you the peace of mind that comes from reliable insights into your supply chains. Compromised shipments can be identified the moment they arrive...

Stop Sweating Temperature Excursions

Advanced chemical indicators give you the peace of mind that comes from reliable insights into your supply chains. Compromised shipments can be identified the moment they arrive...

How Electric Vehicles Help You Prolong the Life of Your Fleet

Before adopting electric vehicles for commercial/government fleets, prioritize cost inquiries. Maintenance is essential; understand the upkeep of EV fleets. Here’s what you need...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!