• Freight Infrastructure Benefits Too When Cutting Climate-warming Emissions

    April 20, 2015
    2 min read

    With new fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas standards expected to be proposed within the next two months, we’re looking at how these standards benefit the trucking industry, which is the source of 6% of U.S. climate warming emissions.

    The most obvious benefits are the lower lifecycle costs more efficient trucks provide today. Strong, long-term standards also benefit the industry in the mid-term by encouraging manufacturers to perfect and scale improved efficiency solutions. For example, the U.S. Energy Information Agency projects that the average efficiency of a new heavy truck in 2025 will be 6.8 MPG.  With strong standards in place, the average efficiency of a new tractor-trailer truck could be 10.7 MPG – saving over $20,000 a year in fuel.

    There is a third way the trucking industry benefits too. It’s the long-term strength of our infrastructure. A warming climate will have major ramifications. A 2014 assessment report from leading researchers, found among other impact that:

    • “Sea level rise, coupled with storm surge, will continue to increase the risk of major coastal impacts on transportation infrastructure, including both temporary and permanent flooding of airports, ports and harbors, roads, rail lines, tunnels, and bridges”
    • “Extreme weather events currently disrupt transportation networks in all areas of the country; projections indicate that such disruptions will increase”

    Ramifications such as these would require major investments to adapt to climate-related impacts. Examples include:

    • adjusting bridge clearances to accommodate safe passage of large vessels
    • elevating main access roads to marine port facilities
    • increasing need for sediment removal from navigation channels
    • expanding the capacity of storm drainage systems for highways, tunnels and city streets to handle extreme weather events and prevent localized flooding

    The researchers concluded that there is “substantial evidence that costs will be significant,” noting several examples of multi-billion dollar projects for adapting roadways to a warmer climate.

    If we choose not to act to reduce greenhouse gas emissions today, we are choosing by default a massive investment to adapt our roads, ports, bridges, tunnels, railways and other critical transportation infrastructure to a warmer world.

    The funds to do this, of course, will need to come from somewhere. They will compete with and divert resources that otherwise could be used to maintain or improve existing infrastructure – further straining productivity and exacerbating congestion.

    Improving fuel efficiency of heavy trucks saves the trucking industry money today, enables greater savings tomorrow, and helps to safeguard the vital infrastructure upon which the industry depends.

    About the Author

    Jason Mathers

    Sr. Manager, Supply Chain Logistics

    Jason Mathers is the associate vice president of the zero-emission truck initiative for the Environmental Defense Fund. Mathers has a graduate degree in economics from Suffolk University and a B.S. in environmental science from the University of Massachusetts. He is a veteran of the U.S. Navy.

    Voice your opinion!

    To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

    Sign up for our free eNewsletters

    Latest from Emissions & Efficiency

    Windrose Technology
    Windrose Technology Class 8 truck
    Charging technology, although many fleets still find it complicated, is improving. Here are two innovations—one in a vehicle and the other with charging infrastructure—that look...
    PBS News
    Trump speaks before signing resolutions
    Trump signed three resolutions to terminate CARB’s waivers for Advanced Clean Trucks, Advanced Clean Cars II, and Heavy-Duty NOx. The resolutions are a major blow to California...
    331398883 | Snehitdesign | Dreamstime.com
    Gas prices drop while diesel sees minor increase: Regional trends and current averages