Bringing clarity to fuel economy testing

Feb. 12, 2016
New Confidence Report from NACFE explains differences between fuel economy testing methods

Sometimes having too many choices is a bad thing. It can actually make things more confusing. That’s certainly true for fleets that are trying to estimate the fuel efficiency of a new technology. The sheer number of testing methods available means proper fuel economy evaluation is no slam dunk. And worse yet there are many ways to interpret the test results.

All the methods for testing fuel efficiency have value and each produces useful information. However, many of the test procedures and methods don’t equate to what happens in actual fleet operations.

One place where confusion is rampant is with the terms “precision” and “accuracy.” Precision is how closely a test result will be repeated by additional tests. Accuracy is how well the test compares to known reference values.

In an attempt to bring some clarity to the issue of fuel efficiency testing, we released a Confidence Report on Determining Efficiency. It explains why and how the various test methods differ not only from each other, but also from an individual fleet’s real-world experiences.

The report highlights the fact that not all test methods are actually evaluating the same factors and that there typically are many important qualifiers in the tests’ fine print. It’s can be like comparing apples to oranges. So it can be difficult to know how to apply the test results to your own fleet.

Large fleets often conduct their own tests and the decisions they make on vehicle technology spec’ing can influence smaller fleets that are unable to perform their own evaluations.

It seems there is plenty of data out there about the efficiency of various technologies but not all that information has been widely shared. It needs to be because doing so can help identify and quantify gaps in test and analysis processes and provide industry-supported recommendations for improvements.

Our goal is to increase confidence in technologies that improve freight efficiency. Improving understanding of the test methods used to determine potential fuel savings will go far in improving confidence fleets have in the test results and allow them to make more informed and better decisions. Let us know if our Determining Efficiency report brings more precision and accuracy to your fuel efficiency investment decisions.

About the Author

Michael Roeth | Executive Director

Michael Roeth is the executive director of the North American Council for Freight Efficiency. He serves on the second National Academy of Sciences Committee on Technologies and Approaches for Reducing the Fuel Consumption of Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicles and has held various positions with Navistar and Behr/Cummins.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

AI is Scary for Your Competition - How Adopting New Technologies Can Provide a Competitive Edge

Unlock the power of AI and leave your competition behind! Join our webinar to discover how adopting cutting-edge AI technologies in transportation can enhance safety, boost efficiency...

Proactive Fuel Risk Management Guide

Download this informative guide to explore innovative techniques to prevent fuel fraud and misuse before it happens. Understand how to save 11% or more in fuel-related costs while...

Going Mobile: Guide To Starting A Heavy-Duty Repair Shop

Discover if starting a heavy-duty mobile repair business is right for you. Learn the ins and outs of licensing, building, and marketing your mobile repair shop.

Increase your fleet’s fuel economy with the right lubricants

See how Mobil Delvac™ oils boosted GP Transco's fleet.