Image: Achates Power
Achates Power's two-stroke opposed-piston engine design claims optimized airflow, simplified design, greater efficiency and much less emissions than a conventional four-stroke diesel engine.

Building a better diesel mouse trap

Nov. 20, 2018
A demonstration project is working on a radically different commercial diesel engine that emits much less, burns less fuel and produces more power.

A California project is working to produce a radically different commercial diesel engine that emits much less, burns less fuel, and produces the same or more power as a conventional diesel powerplant in smaller-displacement package. 

This on-road demo eventually will see this new engine under the hood of a Peterbilt Model 579. At the heart of the project is a 10L two-stroke opposed piston engine from Achates Power.

A traditional four-stroke engine has a single piston per cylinder being driven up and down as fuel and air come in, are compressed and are ignited, and exhaust gases are then pushed out. Valves, injectors, nozzles and spark ignition typically conduct that orchestra from the cylinder head above.

An opposed-piston engine is very different—two linked pistons push back and forth in each cylinder—and there's no cylinder head at all.

"Throughout the 20th century, when the utmost fuel, weight and volume efficiencies were required to propel aircraft, ships and vehicles, an unconventional type of compression ignition engine was used: opposed-piston engines," Achates states on its website.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) provided $9 million to CALSTART, a clean transportation catalyst group that's managing the project. Achates Power will provide the engine and is leading a project team of Aramco Services, BASF, Corning, Dana, Delphi, Eaton, Faurecia, Federal Mogul, Honeywell and Litens joined also by the Southwest Research Institute. 

This 10L opposed-piston diesel will be roughly equivalent to a 15L four-stroke, according to Mihai Dorobantu, director of technology planning and government affairs at Eaton Vehicle Group. Eaton technology will manage the precise airflow needed for the opposed-piston engine with a Twin Vortices Series (TVS) air pump/ charger—belt-driven so far in this demo, though there are other options—and the company is developing a new TVS component for the purpose.

Achates was formed in 2004 and has been working on opposed-piston engines for the U.S. military. Achates and Cummins Inc. have been collaborating on a new family of engines for the U.S. Army since 2014 and are slated to build, test and commercialize new products in that vein within about the next three years.

The opposed-piston engine design is scalable and efficient, according to Achates, and could be used to make engines for that effort anywhere from a 4.0L 300 hp. to a 20.0L 1,500 hp. unit.

Some claimed benefits of an opposed-piston engine vs. a conventional design include: 

—Lower fuel consumption. Opposed-piston engines are said to wring more power out of less displacement and fuel burned with their more efficient design.

—Lower emissions. The CALSTART demo is targeting CARB's lowest Ultra-Low NOx standard while also lowering CO2 emissions "well below today's best trucks," according to Achates, up to 15-20% less carbon emissions than required under current greenhouse gas standards. 

—Simplified engine and components with cylinder head/ valvetrain eliminated. It could translate to less friction, loss and overall cost for this type of internal combustion engine as well as related benefits like less maintenance.

About the Author

Aaron Marsh

Before computerization had fully taken hold and automotive work took someone who speaks engine, Aaron grew up in Upstate New York taking cars apart and fixing and rewiring them, keeping more than a few great jalopies (classics) on the road that probably didn't deserve to be. He spent a decade inside the Beltway covering Congress and the intricacies of the health care system before a stint in local New England news, picking up awards for both pen and camera.

He wrote about you-name-it, from transportation and law and the courts to events of all kinds and telecommunications, and landed in trucking when he joined FleetOwner in July 2015. Long an editorial leader, he was a keeper of knowledge at FleetOwner ready to dive in on the technical and the topical inside and all-around trucking—and still turned a wrench or two. Or three. 

Aaron previously wrote for FleetOwner. 

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Reducing CSA Violations & Increasing Safety With Advanced Trailer Telematics

Keep the roads safer with advanced trailer telematics. In this whitepaper, see how you can gain insights that lead to increased safety and reduced roadside incidents—keeping drivers...

80% Fewer Towable Accidents - 10 Key Strategies

After installing grille guards on all of their Class 8 trucks, a major Midwest fleet reported they had reduced their number of towable accidents by 80% post installation – including...

Proactive Fleet Safety: A Guide to Improved Efficiency and Profitability

Each year, carriers lose around 32.6 billion vehicle hours as a result of weather-related congestion. Discover how to shift from reactive to proactive, improve efficiency, and...

Tackling the Tech Shortage: Lessons in Recruiting Talent and Reducing Turnover

Discover innovative strategies for recruiting and retaining tech talent in the trucking industry during this informative webinar, where experts will share insights on competitive...