Testing conducted on fuel economy of Canter FE160

May 14, 2012

Mitsubishi Fuso Truck of America (MFTA) said that its 2012 Fuso Canter FE160 achieved 12.331 mpg when loaded to 14,490 lbs. in testing conducted by Automotive Testing and Development Services (ATDS).

MFTA said the testing included a comparison to an “equivalently configured” 2011 Isuzu NPR-HD model under “identical conditions over a 97.4-mi. course that covered a mixture of city, suburban, and highway driving conditions with both trucks loaded to 14,490 lbs.” Under these conditions, MFTA said, the Canter achieved 8.45% higher fuel economy than the NPR-HD, which reached 11.370 mpg.

Testing was conducted in strict accordance with SAE J1321 Type II Fuel Consumption Test procedures, the company said, and included multiple runs conducted over several days, and filtered to eliminate any run where the elapsed time varied by more than 0.5% from the average.

The testing was conducted with both vehicles operating in “normal driving mode,” MFTA said.

The full report with complete test protocol and detailed results is available at http://mitfuso.com/fuel.
 

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Mitigate Risk with Data from Route Scores

Route Scores help fleets navigate the risk factors they encounter in the lanes they travel, helping to keep costs down.

Uniting for Bold Solutions to Tackle Transportation’s Biggest Challenges

Over 300 leaders in transportation, logistics, and distribution gathered at Ignite 2024. From new products to innovative solutions, Ignite highlighted the importance of strong...

Seasonal Strategies for Maintaining a Safe & Efficient Fleet Year-Round

Prepare your fleet for every season! From winterizing vehicles to summer heat safety, our eBook covers essential strategies for year-round fleet safety. Download now to reduce...

Streamline Compliance, Ensure Safety and Maximize Driver's Time

Truck weight isn’t the first thing that comes to mind when considering operational efficiency, hours-of-service regulations, and safety ratings, but it can affect all three.