Trucker 854 Speed Limit Lg

OOIDA, ATA ask for more time on speed limiters

Sept. 13, 2016
Trucking groups cite NPRM's complexity, 'significant' impact

The two largest trucking trade associations have each asked the Dept. for Transportation for more time to study the recently published truck speed limiter proposal, citing the rule’s complexity, changing industry dynamics, and the “significant” impact of such a regulation.

In Sept. 9 letters to Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, the American Trucking Assns. (ATA) and the Owner-Operator Independent Driver Assn. (OOIDA) made their respective cases for an extended public comment period.

“The rule, as proposed, would have a significant impact on the whole of ATA’s membership and many more industry participants,” writes ATA, which had petitioned for a speed limiter mandate 10 years ago.

The organization and its state affiliates, along with the Truckload Carriers Assn. (TCA), note that “much has changed in vehicle and motor carrier safety” over the decade. The letter points to the development and adoption of safety technologies, the greater scrutiny of carriers under the Compliance, Safety, and Accountability program, and electronic logs as examples.

“These developments, along with new state laws and speed limits, have changed the way motor carriers view and respond to safety concerns,” ATA says.

Additionally, ATA points to the proposed rule’s “dramatic departure” from the initial petition, in terms of tamper proofing protections, the lack of a retrofit requirement, and the DOT’s reluctance to specify a governed speed. ATA requests an additional 30 days “to reengage its membership” on the matter.

OOIDA, which represents small business truckers, asks for a 60-day extension of the comment period, citing the “wide range of issues” related to limiting truck speed and noting that the proposal is “based on complex research that in some instances is being used in an unconventional way.”

“This is one of the most significant NPRMs in decades as it relates to the safety of the traveling public, roadway efficiency, and the livelihood of our nation’s professional truck drivers,” OOIDA writes. “One way or another, the outcome of this NPRM will impact everyone.”

The comment period is currently scheduled to run through Nov. 7. Comments may be filed at regulations.gov.

About the Author

Kevin Jones | Editor

Kevin has served as editor-in-chief of Trailer/Body Builders magazine since 2017—just the third editor in the magazine’s 60 years. He is also editorial director for Endeavor Business Media’s Commercial Vehicle group, which includes FleetOwner, Bulk Transporter, Refrigerated Transporter, American Trucker, and Fleet Maintenance magazines and websites.

Working from Little Rock, Kevin has covered trucking and manufacturing for 15 years. His writing and commentary about the trucking industry and, previously, business and government, has been recognized with numerous state, regional, and national journalism awards.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Leveraging telematics to get the most from insurance

Fleet owners are quickly adopting telematics as part of their risk mitigation strategy. Here’s why.

Reliable EV Charging Solution for Last-Mile Delivery Fleets

Selecting the right EV charging infrastructure and the right partner to best solve your needs are critical. Learn which solution PepsiCo is choosing to power their fleet and help...

Overcoming Common Roadblocks Associated with Fleet Electrification at Scale

Fleets in the United States, are increasingly transitioning from internal combustion engine vehicles to electric vehicles. While this shift presents challenges, there are strategies...

Report: The 2024 State of Heavy-Duty Repair

From capitalizing on the latest revenue trends to implementing strategic financial planning—this report serves as a roadmap for navigating the challenges and opportunities of ...