Trucker 1109 Distracted 1 Ts

NHTSA ‘oversteps’ in cell phone guidelines, OOIDA says

Feb. 8, 2017
Agency 'ill equipped' to deal with electronic wireless devices

Even as truckers routinely encounter the unsafe behaviors of distracted motorists, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has neither the authority nor the expertise to regulate the use of personal electronics, or so says the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Assn. 

“OOIDA feels that NHTSA can best serve the public by executing the job that Congress intended it to do rather than trying to expand their jurisdiction in areas where they have no statutory authority,” writes OOIDA Executive Vice President Todd Spenser. “NHTSA continues to overstep its authority and continues to fail at its mission of saving lives and improving safety.”

The comment comes in response to NHTSA’s proposed guidelines to address driver distraction caused by mobile and other electronic devices in vehicles, announced last November. These second phase guidelines are meant to provide a safety framework for developers of portable and aftermarket electronic devices to use when designing visual-manual user interfaces for their systems. The first phase focused on devices or systems built into the vehicle at the time of manufacture.

OOIDA readily concedes the need to address distracted driving, and supports driver education and legislation, “particularly regarding teen drivers”—but NHTSA’s guidelines aren’t the solution.

“Everyday our members are forced to take evasive maneuvers to avoid collisions with motorists who are utilizing some form of technology within their vehicle that impedes safe driving habits,” Spencer says. “OOIDA questions NHTSA’s statutory authority over the proposed Phase 2 Guidelines which are outside NHTSA’s jurisdiction over motor vehicle equipment … NHTSA has taken it upon itself to create its own jurisdiction where none exists.”

OOIDA argues that NHTSA is “ill equipped” to deal with electronic wireless devices, and points to the “lack of expertise and consciousness in NHTSA’s proposed speed limiter mandate” for heavy-duty vehicles. Indeed, NHTSA “has a history” of submitting recommendations to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration without “the necessary due diligence and substantive research.”

But, if NHTSA moves forward with the guidelines, OOIDA requests that the agency consider the electronic tools truck drivers use on a regular basis and the negative results of guidelines that would hamper the use of these applications. Examples cited by OOIDA include navigational applications for truck routing, applications that monitor temperature-controlled loads, and applications that advise truck drivers of real time truck parking availability.

OOIDA also points out that many drivers utilize hands-free communications applications which allow them to acquire real-time weather and traffic information, and to have contact with shippers and receivers.  “It allows those who ship security sensitive commodities the peace of mind of being able to contact their driver at a moment’s notice if there’s an incident or issue that needs to be addressed immediately,” Spencer writes.

Additionally, more than 200,000 truck drivers have been trained as First Observers by TSA, to phone in suspicious activity that could be related to terrorism.

“In conclusion, OOIDA implores NHTSA to expend their resources and funds in capacities where they have statutory authority, rather than areas where they do not such as smart phones and smart phone applications,” Spencer writes.

Some in trucking think NHTSA’s plan is a “great idea,” however. In his comment, Gerald McCarty identifies himself as a safety manager for a trucking company, and he contends that current laws aimed reducing handheld phone use by motorists “might as well be tossed out the window,” based on his on-the-road observations.

“Very dangerous! This issue should have been taken care of long time ago to jam cell phones while vehicles are in motion,” he writes. “If this goes through you will see the biggest drop in accidents in one year and for the record. Great idea and please get this rolling. Lives depend on it.”

About the Author

Kevin Jones | Editor

Kevin has served as editor-in-chief of Trailer/Body Builders magazine since 2017—just the third editor in the magazine’s 60 years. He is also editorial director for Endeavor Business Media’s Commercial Vehicle group, which includes FleetOwner, Bulk Transporter, Refrigerated Transporter, American Trucker, and Fleet Maintenance magazines and websites.

Working from Little Rock, Kevin has covered trucking and manufacturing for 15 years. His writing and commentary about the trucking industry and, previously, business and government, has been recognized with numerous state, regional, and national journalism awards.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Leveraging telematics to get the most from insurance

Fleet owners are quickly adopting telematics as part of their risk mitigation strategy. Here’s why.

Reliable EV Charging Solution for Last-Mile Delivery Fleets

Selecting the right EV charging infrastructure and the right partner to best solve your needs are critical. Learn which solution PepsiCo is choosing to power their fleet and help...

Overcoming Common Roadblocks Associated with Fleet Electrification at Scale

Fleets in the United States, are increasingly transitioning from internal combustion engine vehicles to electric vehicles. While this shift presents challenges, there are strategies...

Report: The 2024 State of Heavy-Duty Repair

From capitalizing on the latest revenue trends to implementing strategic financial planning—this report serves as a roadmap for navigating the challenges and opportunities of ...