Image

I-90 in Massachusetts no longer a "Fast Lane"

Dec. 6, 2010
As states struggle to cut budget deficits, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick proposed merging transportation departments in the state, eliminating the Turnpike Authority which governed the Massachusetts Turnpike (MassPike), a 138-mile stretch of ...

As states struggle to cut budget deficits, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick proposed merging transportation departments in the state, eliminating the Turnpike Authority which governed the Massachusetts Turnpike (MassPike), a 138-mile stretch of Interstate 90 connecting the New York Thruway to Boston.

Under the old arrangement, the MassPike was run by the Turnpike Authority. Because the Authority ran the highway through tolls and did not use federal funds, it had the authority to sell sponsorships to the highway, which it did to the tune of $500,000 a year to Citizens Bank for “Fast Lane” sponsorship, according to the Boston Herald.

Fast Lane is nothing more than the electronic toll booths, allowing frequent travelers of the road to use transponders to bypass stopping and paying tolls.

The article went on to say that the 2009 transportation reform law eliminated the Turnpike Authority, essentially transferring ownership of the highway to the state Dept. of Transportation (MassDOT). That meant the road would now fall under Federal Highway Administration oversight. FHA does not allow sponsorships.

“These changes were supposed to save money, but once again the toll payers are left holding the bag,” Mary Connaughton, a former board member of the Turnpike Authority, told the Herald.

Travelers will see no major changes, except for some new signs, other than the rebranding of the Fast Lane name to E-Zpass. Transponders and billing will continue to operate normally, officials told the Herald.

The contract with Citizens Bank has 10 months remaining on it, which MassDOT told the paper would continue until it runs out, but no future sponsorships will be sold.

I’m sure there are real reasons for the government to not allow sponsorships, but isn’t it time to revisit that policy. Massachusetts will be out some $500,000 a year, money it will have to find somewhere because the road still needs to be maintained.

Meanwhile, some states are looking to sell entire stretches of highways to private enterprises to raise money. And billboards, although not owned by states, are popping up all along highways. What’s more distracting to drivers: a billboard with a scantily clad woman promoting the local “adult entertainment” store, as appears here in Connecticut, or a sign above a toll booth that says “Citizens Bank Fast Lane”?

I think it’s just another instance of unnecessary government interference.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Waiting for a breakdown is costing you. Learn how smart preventive maintenance plans, accurate data, and cross-team coordination can protect your bottom line and boost profits...
Is your fleet ready for California's Clean Truck Check program? Our guide helps you navigate CARB compliance, avoid costly fines, and keep your trucks rolling. Learn how telematics...
Boost truck leasing profits with telematics insights! Reduce maintenance costs, improve uptime, and strengthen customer relationships. Learn how data drives success.
This free guide outlines simple steps for hiring and onboarding commercial drivers while ensuring that you meet Regulation Part 391 and maintain fully compliant driver qualification...