ATA gears up to oppose SHIPA weight restrictions

Sept. 13, 2001
The American Trucking Assns. is ratcheting up its efforts to oppose the Safe Highways and Infrastructure Preservation Act (SHIPA) to prevent the implementation of federal truck size and weight standards. William Canary, ATA’s interim president, and James Whittinghill, Senior vp for Legislative Affairs, sent a letter sent to all members of the U.S. House of Representatives last week blasting those
The American Trucking Assns. is ratcheting up its efforts to oppose the Safe Highways and Infrastructure Preservation Act (SHIPA) to prevent the implementation of federal truck size and weight standards.

William Canary, ATA’s interim president, and James Whittinghill, Senior vp for Legislative Affairs, sent a letter sent to all members of the U.S. House of Representatives last week blasting those provisions and asking Congressional members not to support the SHIPA bill.

“SHIPA would purloin state authority and impose federal truck length and weight limits on the 159,000 miles of interstate and primary highways that make up the National Highway System (NHS),” the letter said. “Over the years, States have changed their laws to reflect the evolving needs of their economies, the nature and condition of their highway systems, and shifts in centers of population and economic activity. Abrogating our States' ability to change their size and weight limits will not stop these changes from occurring. Rather, the proposal would prevent States from effectively responding to constantly changing conditions.”

The ATA said that, due to tremendous growth in demand for trucking services, by 2008 there will be a need for 2.3 million additional trucks on the road and truck vehicle miles of travel will increase by 117 billion. “This will strain a highway system that, in many parts of the country, is already beyond capacity. States need more, not fewer, options to address their transportation challenges,” the letter said.

“We hope you will oppose this misguided effort and can count on your support for legislative initiatives that will give States the flexibility they need to set reasonable truck size and weight limits,” the letter added.

About the Author

Sean Kilcarr | Editor in Chief

Sean Kilcarr is a former longtime FleetOwner senior editor who wrote for the publication from 2000 to 2018. He served as editor-in-chief from 2017 to 2018.

 

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Is your fleet ready for California's Clean Truck Check program? Our guide helps you navigate CARB compliance, avoid costly fines, and keep your trucks rolling. Learn how telematics...
Boost truck leasing profits with telematics insights! Reduce maintenance costs, improve uptime, and strengthen customer relationships. Learn how data drives success.
This free guide outlines simple steps for hiring and onboarding commercial drivers while ensuring that you meet Regulation Part 391 and maintain fully compliant driver qualification...
Ready to boost fleet efficiency by up to 50%? Learn how AI-powered dispatch and next-gen tech are transforming TMS workflows, improving driver planning, and streamlining operations...