Musing on medium-duty

Dec. 1, 2001
In some ways, Steven Matsil's appointment to chief engineer for General Motors' medium-duty truck group is a study in fortunate coincidence. For starters, Matsil spent nearly a decade working at GM's proving grounds, learning how to put the best designs and materials to the ultimate tests turning brand new motor homes and trucks into scrap in an effort to find out how they would hold up in the real

In some ways, Steven Matsil's appointment to chief engineer for General Motors' medium-duty truck group is a study in fortunate coincidence. For starters, Matsil spent nearly a decade working at GM's proving grounds, learning how to put the best designs and materials to the ultimate tests — turning brand new motor homes and trucks into scrap in an effort to find out how they would hold up in the real world.

Then there's his original field of engineering study — aviation. Aspects of aviation engineering, especially when it comes to electronic systems, are being steadily incorporated into trucks. And Matsil thinks this will make truck design and development a more complicated and interesting profession in the years ahead.

“We're starting to see aircraft-level hardware migrating into trucks,” he says. “The issue revolves around the more complicated electronics involved not only with engines, but in two-way communication systems that collect and relay data back to the dispatch center. In the future, we're looking at telematic systems that will relay route information to drivers and communicate the status of vehicle components for preventive maintenance purposes.”

The issue with such complicated electronics, says Matsil, is “hardening” them for the far tougher world of medium-duty trucks. “You don't see salt being used on airport runways; trucks are exposed to salt for months at a time on the highways,” he explains. “In the truck environment, electronics need to be temperature-resistant, vibration-resistant, and consistently reliable over the life cycle of the truck. That's our challenge.”

GM recently unveiled its latest medium-duty product, code-named the GMT 560, to replace its venerable line of C-series vehicles. Scheduled for production starting in January 2002, GM considers these trucks to be 2003 models. GVWRs will range from 16,000 to 61,000 lb., making the vehicles available to the lower-end Class 8 market. The crew cab configuration will be available in 2002, followed by a 4WD model.

Vehicle safety in the form of driver control and comfort were huge considerations in the GMT 560 design process, says Matsil. GM conducted extensive surveys and interviews with commercial and municipal fleets, as well as owner-operators.

“These owners and users of medium-duty trucks stressed the driver control and comfort requirements,” he says. “The fleets and owner-operators we surveyed wanted improved forward visibility, tighter turning circle maneuverability, responsive steering control and confident, predictable brake system performance. They also wanted to make pre-trip inspections easier, so drivers could quickly check all the fluid levels before starting out. Daily safety inspections are required on all CDL-level commercial vehicles to ensure that they're road worthy.”

Life cycle cost on a per mile basis, of course, also remains a key concern, as fleets try to find ways to incorporate safety measures cost-effectively. “There's a real increased focus on safety — especially on driver control and comfort, which goes hand and glove with safety. Responsive steering and brakes, comfortable seating, instruments that are easy to read, and accessible switches and controls all promote safer driving,” says Matsil. “But the age-old argument of cost versus benefit remains. The truck market we're in remains very price-sensitive, so the costs of high-tech systems such as back-up and near-obstacle detection, or infrared night vision systems, must be offset,” he continues. “Do the costs of these systems, including maintenance, offset the cost of the vehicle or property incidents incurred? That's where the fleet must make its business decision.”

Each month this column looks at emerging truck technology issues through the eyes of a leading engineer.

About the Author

Sean Kilcarr | Editor in Chief

Sean previously reported and commented on trends affecting the many different strata of the trucking industry. Also be sure to visit Sean's blog Trucks at Work where he offers analysis on a variety of different topics inside the trucking industry.

Sponsored Recommendations

Reducing CSA Violations & Increasing Safety With Advanced Trailer Telematics

Keep the roads safer with advanced trailer telematics. In this whitepaper, see how you can gain insights that lead to increased safety and reduced roadside incidents—keeping drivers...

80% Fewer Towable Accidents - 10 Key Strategies

After installing grille guards on all of their Class 8 trucks, a major Midwest fleet reported they had reduced their number of towable accidents by 80% post installation – including...

Proactive Fleet Safety: A Guide to Improved Efficiency and Profitability

Each year, carriers lose around 32.6 billion vehicle hours as a result of weather-related congestion. Discover how to shift from reactive to proactive, improve efficiency, and...

Tackling the Tech Shortage: Lessons in Recruiting Talent and Reducing Turnover

Discover innovative strategies for recruiting and retaining tech talent in the trucking industry at our April 16th webinar, where experts will share insights on competitive pay...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!