• ArvinMeritor says patent ruling won’t stop transmission

    ArvinMeritor responds to judge's recommendation on FreedomLine transmission
    Jan. 11, 2005
    2 min read

    Pointing out that a U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) judge ruled against 75 of 76 claims of patent infringement involving the ZF FreedomLine transmission, ArvinMeritor Inc. and its partner in the transmission model, ZF Friedrichshafen AG, say they fully expect to continue offering their automated heavy-duty transmission in North America.

    See Import proceedings goes against FreedomLine transmission.

    The ruling, an “initial determination” by an ITC administrative law judge, found that the FreedomLine transmissions infringe upon an Eaton transmission patent. The judge recommended that ITC issue an order prohibiting future importation of ZF FreedomLine transmission systems and components into the United States as well as a cease-and-desist order that would halt the sale of these products in the U.S., according to Eaton.

    In a response issued today, ZF and ArvinMeritor pointed out that it was a preliminary ruling that still must be finalized by the full commission, which may hear additional arguments. Even if the commission upholds that ruling, the two partners can continue arguing their case in the Federal Court of Appeals.

    “Of the 76 claims in six patents asserted by Eaton, the judge found preliminarily that only one claim in one patent was infringed, and that one claim covers minor aspects of the transmission interaction with other system,” according to Tom Gosnell, president of ArvinMeritor’s Commercial Vehicle Systems. “We are confident, upon appeal, that we will have a different ruling.”

    Both Eaton and the ArvinMeritor/ZF partners have been trading patent infringement charges involving heavy-duty transmission automation for some time. The current case was filed by Eaton in 2003, according to the company. Subsequently, ArvinMeritor filed an infringement suit against Eaton last year involving one of the contested patents. That case, filed in North Carolina, is still pending.

    corrected: The current case was filed by Eaton in 2003, and was not one of three filed in 1997, as orginally published. Eaton says there was only one claim filed in 1997, and that an initial ruling in their favor was later overturned.

    About the Author

    Jim Mele

    Jim Mele is a former longtime editor-in-chief of FleetOwner. He joined the magazine in 1986 and served as chief editor from 1999 to 2017. 

    Voice your opinion!

    To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

    Sign up for our free eNewsletters

    Latest from News

    Yevheniia Ryzhova | Dreamstime.com
    Why Clear Communication is Key to Retaining Happy, Motivated Drivers
    Drivers want to be seen. Supported. Heard. And they can tell when it’s genuine and when it’s just for show.
    J.B. Poindexter & Co.
    DCBM brand ambulances
    Parent company of work truck upfitting giants Reading Truck and Morgan Olson expands into the emergency vehicle market with the addition of one of North America’s largest ambulance...
    Oxy
    Occidental Chemical, known as OxyChem, produces indispensable chemicals internationally. This small private fleet covers about 2.5 million miles annually, delivering products to customers across the U.S.
    Members Only
    Leadership and training turned this chemical bulk hauler into one of the safest fleets in the U.S. Intensive training and experience pay off for Oxy's Occidental Chemical transportation...