ArvinMeritor says patent ruling won’t stop transmission

Jan. 11, 2005
ArvinMeritor responds to judge's recommendation on FreedomLine transmission

Pointing out that a U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) judge ruled against 75 of 76 claims of patent infringement involving the ZF FreedomLine transmission, ArvinMeritor Inc. and its partner in the transmission model, ZF Friedrichshafen AG, say they fully expect to continue offering their automated heavy-duty transmission in North America.

See Import proceedings goes against FreedomLine transmission.

The ruling, an “initial determination” by an ITC administrative law judge, found that the FreedomLine transmissions infringe upon an Eaton transmission patent. The judge recommended that ITC issue an order prohibiting future importation of ZF FreedomLine transmission systems and components into the United States as well as a cease-and-desist order that would halt the sale of these products in the U.S., according to Eaton.

In a response issued today, ZF and ArvinMeritor pointed out that it was a preliminary ruling that still must be finalized by the full commission, which may hear additional arguments. Even if the commission upholds that ruling, the two partners can continue arguing their case in the Federal Court of Appeals.

“Of the 76 claims in six patents asserted by Eaton, the judge found preliminarily that only one claim in one patent was infringed, and that one claim covers minor aspects of the transmission interaction with other system,” according to Tom Gosnell, president of ArvinMeritor’s Commercial Vehicle Systems. “We are confident, upon appeal, that we will have a different ruling.”

Both Eaton and the ArvinMeritor/ZF partners have been trading patent infringement charges involving heavy-duty transmission automation for some time. The current case was filed by Eaton in 2003, according to the company. Subsequently, ArvinMeritor filed an infringement suit against Eaton last year involving one of the contested patents. That case, filed in North Carolina, is still pending.

corrected: The current case was filed by Eaton in 2003, and was not one of three filed in 1997, as orginally published. Eaton says there was only one claim filed in 1997, and that an initial ruling in their favor was later overturned.

About the Author

Jim Mele

Nationally recognized journalist, author and editor, Jim Mele joined Fleet Owner in 1986 with over a dozen years’ experience covering transportation as a newspaper reporter and magazine staff writer. Fleet Owner Magazine has won over 45 national editorial awards since his appointment as editor-in-chief in 1999.

Sponsored Recommendations

Reducing CSA Violations & Increasing Safety With Advanced Trailer Telematics

Keep the roads safer with advanced trailer telematics. In this whitepaper, see how you can gain insights that lead to increased safety and reduced roadside incidents—keeping drivers...

80% Fewer Towable Accidents - 10 Key Strategies

After installing grille guards on all of their Class 8 trucks, a major Midwest fleet reported they had reduced their number of towable accidents by 80% post installation – including...

Proactive Fleet Safety: A Guide to Improved Efficiency and Profitability

Each year, carriers lose around 32.6 billion vehicle hours as a result of weather-related congestion. Discover how to shift from reactive to proactive, improve efficiency, and...

Tackling the Tech Shortage: Lessons in Recruiting Talent and Reducing Turnover

Discover innovative strategies for recruiting and retaining tech talent in the trucking industry during this informative webinar, where experts will share insights on competitive...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!