• Interest groups aim to head off potential HOS change

    Oct. 17, 2014
    2 min read
    Image

    Results from a new public opinion survey sponsored by several highway safety-focused interest groups are being used as part of a broader effort to head-off Congressional efforts to increase the allowable work hours for truck drivers from 70 to 82 per week.

    The Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (AHAS) and Truck Safety Coalition (TSC) commissioned Lake Research Partners to conduct this survey back in August, which found 80% of the 1,016 men and women in the poll did not support raising the number of hours a truck driver is allowed to work per week.

    "This survey reveals a clear disconnect between what the public wants and what special trucking interests want from Congress at the expense of public safety for everyone,” noted AHAS President Jackie Gillan in a statement. “We urge Congress to reject this anti-safety change and heed the public's correct assessment of the dangers."

    The change in question is contained within an appropriations amendment sponsored by Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) last June that got tabled in the wake of a high-profile crash that injured comedian Tracy Morgan and left one of his traveling companions dead.

    When Congress goes back into session following the November elections, AHAS said debate will resume on annual spending bills for federal agencies – including the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development FY 2015 Appropriations bill, which contains the controversial weekly-hours boost in a rider within the Senate’s version of the bill, S. 2438.

    At the same time, another appropriations rider – this one sponsored by Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) – seeks to cancel out Collins’ amendment.

    “Truck accidents are on the rise and driver fatigue is a leading cause,” said Sen. Booker back in June when he and several colleagues introduced their amendment.

    “Truck drivers are working extremely long days to deliver the goods we depend on, but it should never be at the cost of their safety and that of other drivers,” Booker added. “My amendment … calls for the preservation of basic protections that allow these drivers to get sufficient rest to do their job safely and efficiently.”

    About the Author

    Sean Kilcarr

    Editor in Chief

    Sean Kilcarr is a former longtime FleetOwner senior editor who wrote for the publication from 2000 to 2018. He served as editor-in-chief from 2017 to 2018.

     

    Voice your opinion!

    To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

    Sign up for our free eNewsletters

    Latest from Regulations

    ID 119046131 © Jonathan Weiss | Dreamstime.com
    English language proficiency support
    A FleetOwner survey illustrates how industry readers view the government renewed English language proficiency enforcement. Respondents overwhelmingly support ELP in out-of-service...
    PBS News
    Trump speaks before signing resolutions
    Trump signed three resolutions to terminate CARB’s waivers for Advanced Clean Trucks, Advanced Clean Cars II, and Heavy-Duty NOx. The resolutions are a major blow to California...
    ID 1069347 © Badboo | Dreamstime.com
    traffic sign without language
    Is ELP enforcement an important safety issue? Take a few seconds to share your thoughts and see what others said.