Truck tolls

White House report critical of fuel tax, questions if truckers are paying enough

Feb. 25, 2018
Council of Economic Advisors says "heavy trucks in particular do not currently face taxes and charges that are aligned with the negative externalities they generate."

A new economic report from the White House downplays the effectiveness of fuel taxes, and questions whether truckers are paying enough under the current system.

“Evidence suggests that heavy trucks in particular do not currently face taxes and charges that are aligned with the negative externalities they generate, which include pavement damage, traffic congestion, accident risk, and emissions. Even excluding emissions, these external costs are significant,” said the Annual Report of the Council of Economic Advisers.

The White House included the report as part of its “Economic Report of the President” delivered to Congress and published online Feb. 21. It was issued a week after President Trump sent his infrastructure funding outline to Congress that called for a bill that will generate at least $1.5 trillion over 10 years.

Though the outline left many of the details for Congress to sort out, Trump made headlines after suggesting he would back a 25-cent hike in federal fuel taxes.

However, the White House report said fuel taxes “fail to encourage efficient use of existing roadways and to signal the value of any potential additional capacity.”

The report looked more favorably on tolling, public-private partnerships, and a tax on vehicle-miles traveled (VMT).

Despite higher administrative costs of toll systems, “the economic arguments in favor of using toll revenues to pay for roads and highways are solid,” according to the report.

It said P3s can decrease financial risks of large projects by more efficiently utilizing available capital, though success depends “on coordination and shared responsibility among multiple entities.”

It also called for considering “innovative” ways to supplement or replace fuel taxes with a user fee. It cited the VMT pilot in Oregon as an example of a program that “can increase efficiency and raise needed revenues to pay for infrastructure improvements and additions to capacity.”

The report estimated a VMT tax on commercial trucks would raise $43 billion in tax revenues. It added there are greater efficiency benefits when the VMT tax is higher in urban areas than in rural areas.

Though the Oregon program was only a small pilot, “it has given policymakers some real experiences on which to base future policy and program decisions.”

The report also backed up Trump’s beliefs that states and local governments are more critical than the federal government on funding, and recommended efforts to ensure states contribute more funding for every federal dollar provided than they do currently.

The more than 550-page document was fairly light on references to freight transportation – the majority were related to waterways or examples of user fees on commercial vehicles in foreign nations.

American Trucking Associations has been seeking support for its “Build America Fund” that includes a user fee built into the price of wholesale transportation fuels collected at the terminal rack, phased in at a nickel per year over four years. The group offered a cautious reaction to the local emphasis on funding decisions.

“It is important to get state and local input on important infrastructure projects, but our system of highways and bridges is a national network and that requires a national solution and coordination between states. The federal government has always had an important role to play in planning and, more importantly, funding our infrastructure and as an interstate industry, we firmly believe that role should continue," ATA said in an e-mailed statement.

About the Author

Neil Abt

Neil Abt, editorial director at Fleet Owner, is a veteran journalist with over 20 years of reporting experience, including 15 years spent covering the trucking industry. A graduate of American University in Washington, D.C., he began his career covering sports for The Washington Post newspaper, followed by a position in the newsroom of America Online (AOL) and then both reporting and leadership roles at Transport Topics. Abt is based out of Portland, Oregon.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Leveraging telematics to get the most from insurance

Fleet owners are quickly adopting telematics as part of their risk mitigation strategy. Here’s why.

Reliable EV Charging Solution for Last-Mile Delivery Fleets

Selecting the right EV charging infrastructure and the right partner to best solve your needs are critical. Learn which solution PepsiCo is choosing to power their fleet and help...

Overcoming Common Roadblocks Associated with Fleet Electrification at Scale

Fleets in the United States, are increasingly transitioning from internal combustion engine vehicles to electric vehicles. While this shift presents challenges, there are strategies...

Report: The 2024 State of Heavy-Duty Repair

From capitalizing on the latest revenue trends to implementing strategic financial planning—this report serves as a roadmap for navigating the challenges and opportunities of ...