File photo
The need to provide ELD makers time to update devices, and the possibility of legal challenges are reasons it could be many months before HOS changes are finalized.
The need to provide ELD makers time to update devices, and the possibility of legal challenges are reasons it could be many months before HOS changes are finalized.
The need to provide ELD makers time to update devices, and the possibility of legal challenges are reasons it could be many months before HOS changes are finalized.
The need to provide ELD makers time to update devices, and the possibility of legal challenges are reasons it could be many months before HOS changes are finalized.
The need to provide ELD makers time to update devices, and the possibility of legal challenges are reasons it could be many months before HOS changes are finalized.

Waiting on HOS changes? It may still be a while

Aug. 18, 2019
ELD updates, possible legal challenges will need to be considered before FMCSA can issue a final rule

Even with the expected publication of the updated hours-of-service proposal this week in the Federal Register, it will still be a while before any changes are finalized.

“It will probably be at least the end of 2020 before we see new rules go into effect,” Brandon Wiseman, a partner with Scopelitis, Garvin, Light, Hanson & Feary, told Fleet Owner.

The formal publication of the HOS proposal kicks off a 45-day widow for public comments, which Wiseman noted could be extended by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration “if there is a compelling reason to do so.”

From there, agency officials must review the comments, decide if any changes to the initial proposal are warranted and determine if a final rule should ultimately be issued.

The next hurdle is selecting the effective date for the new rule. In the proposal, FMCSA specifically asked electric logging device manufactures for feedback on how much time is needed to update software or reprogram devices – six months or one year.

FMCSA said that compliant ELDs do not have to be updated as a result of the proposal. It also stated, however, some manufacturers provide features such as alerts when a driver may be close to an HOS violation.

“Those additional features would need to be updated as a result of the rule, or risk being inaccurate,” FMCSA said, adding that these functions were not included in the estimate that the rule would provide $274 million in savings for the U.S. economy and consumers. 

Wiseman also cautioned is it “more likely than not” that legal challenges could arise from the proposal, based on initial statements issued by advocacy and labor groups.

The Truck Safety Coalition, Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety and Teamsters union have already come out against the proposed changes, saying longer work periods will increase fatigue and lead to more health problems for truck drivers.

Speaking out against the split-duty provision, Cathy Chase, president of Advocates, said research shows driving later in the duty period is associated with higher crash risks. The groups also pointed out the National Transportation Safety Board has included reducing fatigue in its Most Wanted List of safety changes since 2016. 

In an effort to address concerns documented in the public comments FMCSA could make additional changes as part of the final rule. Even if this happens, legal challenges remains a possibility, Wiseman warned.

There were lawsuits filed the last time there were significant HOS changes in the early 2000s. Likewise, there were similar legal challenges that derailed previous attempts by FMCSA to mandate the use of ELDs, prior to the successful implementation of the rule in December 2017.

Wiseman suggested the mostly positive reaction across trucking, including both American Trucking Associations (ATA) and the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Associations (OOIDA), is a good sign for those in favor of the changes. The groups are often at odds on issues, including the perceived benefits of the ELD mandate.

OOIDA’s Todd Spencer called the proposed changes “a positive start since truckers don’t have any control over their schedules or traffic conditions.”

In an e-mail as the proposal was being issued, Scopelitis Transportation Consulting said no matter the type or size of a fleet, filing comments with FMCSA is an important step in this overall process.

“If you don’t comment, you shouldn’t complain about the final HOS rule outcome,” Scopelitis wrote.

About the Author

Neil Abt

Neil Abt, editorial director at Fleet Owner, is a veteran journalist with over 20 years of reporting experience, including 15 years spent covering the trucking industry. A graduate of American University in Washington, D.C., he began his career covering sports for The Washington Post newspaper, followed by a position in the newsroom of America Online (AOL) and then both reporting and leadership roles at Transport Topics. Abt is based out of Portland, Oregon.

Sponsored Recommendations

Stop Sweating Temperature Excursions

Advanced chemical indicators give you the peace of mind that comes from reliable insights into your supply chains. Compromised shipments can be identified the moment they arrive...

How Electric Vehicles Help You Prolong the Life of Your Fleet

Before adopting electric vehicles for commercial/government fleets, prioritize cost inquiries. Maintenance is essential; understand the upkeep of EV fleets. Here’s what you need...

How to Choose the Right Route Planning Solution

This free buyer's guide will help equip you with the knowledge and insights needed to analyze route planning software and vendors in the market and, ultimately, make an informed...

How to Put Your Trucking Data to Work

How fleets can overcome data overload to optimize operations and get ahead.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!