2026 Third-Party Logistics Study: How shippers and 3PLs can align in a changing market

Despite progress toward strategic alliances, notable differences remain between shippers and 3PLs regarding goals, investments, and expectations, highlighting opportunities for better alignment in the evolving logistics sector.
Oct. 15, 2025
5 min read

Key takeaways

  • This year's Third-Party Logistics Study shows a shift toward strategic partnerships driven by supply chain disruptions, cost savings, and digital transformation needs.
  • Shippers prioritize performance, transparency, and on-time deliveries, demanding more from their carrier partners.
  • Both shippers and 3PLs value service level agreements and joint governance, but gaps exist in areas like gain-sharing and co-investment priorities.
  • Technology use enhances visibility and data insights, benefiting both shippers and 3PLs by improving agility and asset utilization.
  • Aligning goals around investments in human capital and sustainability could strengthen long-term partnerships in the logistics industry.

The years following the COVID-19 pandemic continue to challenge the trucking industry. Analysts predicted we’d be climbing out of the hole by now, but tariffs and regulatory policy are further pushing the freight recovery timeline. How are shippers and carriers dealing with this tough environment?

To combat market volatility, both shippers and carriers are focusing on strategic partnerships that are mutually beneficial, according to the latest Annual Third-Party Logistics Study from NTT Data and Penn State University.

The study surveyed an undisclosed number of shippers and 3PLs in leadership, management, or analyst roles.

Here’s how they believe the current market and technology impact operations.

Evolving 3PL market dynamics: How shippers’ expectations are driving logistics performance

They say that less is more—that is, unless you’re a shipper. Increasingly, shippers desire that their carrier partners offer more visibility, more transparency, and more on-time deliveries—all without shipper intervention. In essence, shippers are choosing carrier partners and 3PL providers based on performance, the report states.

“It’s no longer sufficient to simply execute, moving freight from Point A to Point B,” according to report authors. “Shippers demand continuous improvement, value creation, and the targeted use of technology and expertise to drive efficiency and insight.”

Further, shippers expect 3PLs to “adapt to changing market conditions” within the scope of their contractual agreements, minimizing impact on shippers’ costs. This expectation reflects the trend that shippers prefer 3PLs to take on more risks, emphasizing “mutual value creation, adaptability, and trust,” the report states.

Despite market challenges, 3PLs seem to be meeting these shipper expectations.

According to this year’s report, 88% of shippers believe their 3PL providers solve their needs and challenges, compared to 69% last year. According to 75% of shippers, 3PLs also contribute to reducing overall logistics costs, which is up from 66% of shippers who said the same last year.

Shippers are also concerned with their 3PL’s use of technology, as they “increasingly expect high levels of visibility and data-driven insights,” the report states. However, 3PLs’ and carriers’ use of technology tend to be two-fold: Add value to the shipper through visibility as well as to benefit their own business via asset utilization improvements, predictive analytics, and to strengthen “agility and resilience,” according to the report. (The second installment of this series dives more into 3PL technology utilization.)

Strategic shipper–3PL partnerships: Enhancing visibility, collaboration, and operational efficiency

The Annual Third-Party Logistics Study sought to understand whether shipper and 3PL relationships are indeed moving from “transactional to strategic,” or if it’s just the latest talking point at industry conferences, as FleetOwner recently reported.

The study accomplished this by identifying the drivers behind strategic partnerships, which largely boiled down to industry challenges and mutual benefits.

Shippers’ top three drivers to employ strategic partnerships were supply chain disruption complexities (81%), collaborative cost optimization opportunities (76%), and digital transformation (57%).

Strategic partnerships are being sought by 3PLs because of the demand for more visibility (61%), customization and value-add services (61%), customer experience (56%), and—along with shippers—the desire for cost optimization via collaboration (56%). 

Study respondents also indicated which aspects of collaboration are most important when establishing and fostering long-term partnerships. There is strong agreement between 3PLs and shippers regarding the importance of service level agreements (56% and 63%, respectively), joint steering committees (25% and 32%, respectively), and innovation hubs (19% and 16%, respectively.

However, while both shippers and 3PLs appreciate quarterly business reviews, nearly all 3PL respondents (94%) cite it as a factor compared to 68% of shippers. Another expectation gap exists with gain-sharing agreements, with 44% of 3PLs citing importance compared to only 16% of shippers.

The study also gauged areas of business where respondents have co-invested with their partners. Co-investments in operational improvements is the most popular among both shippers and 3PLs, with roughly two-thirds of both groups citing the engagement in operational areas. Shippers and 3PLs largely align with their co-investments in other areas, as well.

While both shippers and 3PLs appear to be moving toward strategic partnerships, the study revealed a disconnect between the desired goals of shippers and 3PLs. For example, 3PLs see customization and value-add services as much more of a drive to establishing a strategic partnership than do shippers (61% versus 29%). On the other hand, nearly a quarter of shippers surveyed are driven to strategic partnerships because of environmental, social, and governance goals compared to only 6% of 3PLs. Shippers are also more concerned with supply chain disruptions (81%) and the digital transformation (57%), compared to 3PLs (50% and 28%, respectively). 

Further discrepancies lie within the two groups’ co-investment areas, with nearly half of 3PLs citing co-investments in human capital compared to only 6% of shippers. These differences in goals, investments, and aspects considered necessary for building a long-lasting partnership highlight clear areas where shippers and 3PLs could work to align. 

In the next part of this series, discover how shippers and 3PLs are building their strategic partnerships and what matters to them. You’ll also learn what emerging technologies are impacting the industry.

About the Author

Jade Brasher

Senior Editor Jade Brasher has covered vocational trucking and fleets since 2018. A graduate of The University of Alabama with a degree in journalism, Jade enjoys telling stories about the people behind the wheel and the intricate processes of the ever-evolving trucking industry.    

Sign up for our free eNewsletters

Voice Your Opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!