“This cost does not include costs to shippers, receivers and others in the supply chain,” he added. “In addition, state enforcement agencies must spend taxpayer money to adapt to the rule changes. If the court agrees, in whole or in part, with ATA that the rule changes at issue must be rejected, those expenditures will have been irrecoverably squandered.”
Bill Graves, ATA’s president and CEO, chimed in with even more blunt words: “At a time of rising diesel prices, increased equipment and labor costs, the decision by the head of FMCSA to reject a reasonable request for a brief delay in enforcing this rule is unbelievable.”
That may be. One thing for certain though is the changes to HOS are going forward as planned, so it’s time to fasten those seat belts.