Previous | Truckload Carriers Association meeting home | Next article
To Get a handle on rising fuel costs, a carrier must first understand its costs, said Corey England, executive vice-president of Salt Lake City-based trucking company CR England, in his presentation, Surviving The Fuel Crisis. Next, it needs to finds ways to reduce fuel expenditures by becoming more efficient, which can be done by doing such things as reducing idle time, improving miles per gallon, and reducing deadhead miles.
Supposing a sample 1,000-mile load, figuring the rig got six milers per gallon and consumed 167 gallons, he said the cost per mile has increased 0.31 cents compared to last year.
“The question is,” he said, “are you covering the increased cost with a fuel surcharge? This same question needs to be asked about reefer fuel. Are you getting a surcharge for reefer fuel?”
Assuming a 1,000-mile load that took 24 hours to deliver, keeping the load at -20° F, the per mile cost of reefer fuel, from last year to this year, has gone up $0.044 per mile. “What are you doing to cover this increase?”
Another key consideration in becoming more efficient is how a carrier manages deadhead and out-of-route miles, England said, noting that some deadhead and out-of-route miles are necessary.
Often, a truck has a pick-up and a different location from where a delivery was made.
Some out-of-route miles are required in order to get drivers home or into maintenance facilities, he said. Some aren't, for example, when allowing drivers to choose their own routes.
Assuming 100 miles out-of-route or deadhead, the increased cost is $0.31 per mile.
The cost of deadhead and out-of-route miles must be understood, said England, so that a carrier can calculate this into rates to offset the added cost.
Other efficiencies
He noted that there are a number of opportunities for increasing efficiency. Chief among them are idle reduction, speed reduction, tractor specs for improved mpg, and fuel theft elimination.
“At CR England, before we did anything to manage idle, we were at about 44% idle time. We have now reduced that to around 7%, and that has resulted in dramatic savings of about $621 per month, or around 6 cents per mile, assuming the truck runs 10,000 miles per month.”
Like many fleets, CR England has reduced the top speed on company trucks. It has been lowered from 65 mph to 62 mph.
“At this point we're seeing about a two tenths miles per hour difference.”
“Surprisingly, we haven't had much flak from our drivers about lowering the speed,” remarked England. “They understand the need for it.”
Other fuel efficiencies can also be obtained through truck specifications, he said. He cited such things as going with aerodynamic models rather than classic styles, using automatic transmissions and wide-base tires, and changing engine horsepower and torque ratings to get better fuel economy.
