Refrigeratedtransporter 2907 Fuso Fe160 Street View

FUSO outperforms Hino, Isuzu trucks in third-party testing

Sept. 18, 2017
Mitsubishi Fuso Truck of America Inc (FUSO) has announced completion of outside, third-party testing by Automotive Testing & Development Services Inc (ATDS), comparing the fuel economy of the Class 4 FUSO FE160 Series medium-duty cabover truck with the Class 4 Isuzu NPR-HD and Hino 155.

Mitsubishi Fuso Truck of America Inc (FUSO) has announced completion of outside, third-party testing by Automotive Testing & Development Services Inc (ATDS), comparing the fuel economy of the Class 4 FUSO FE160 Series medium-duty cabover truck with the fuel economy of an equivalent Class 4 Isuzu NPR-HD and Hino 155.

Over the course of testing, the FE160 consumed 8% less diesel fuel on average than the Hino 155, and 5% less than the Isuzu NPR-HD, measured over a course of city, suburban and highway driving. When ECO mode was engaged on the FE160 (a feature not available on the Hino or Isuzu models), the FE160’s fuel consumption advantage improved to 10% less than the Hino 155, and 9% less than the Isuzu NPR-HD.

According to ATDS, testing procedures used were formulated to meet requirements of SAE J1321 and SAE J1264 fuel consumption test procedures. The test was contracted specifically for the 2017 MY FE160 to measure effects of new hardware, including the electrically engaged radiator fan and new emissions aftertreatment equipment. Competitive models were selected based on readiness and regional commercial availability. Per respective engine emissions certifications from the US Environmental Protection Agency and CARB (California Air Resources Board), engine power, torque and emissions levels for both the Isuzu and Hino models were equivalent to the latest available for each at the time of testing.

To eliminate fuel gauge and in-dash odometer variability, the in-dash odometers and the trucks’ standard fuel tanks and fuel gauges were not used during testing. Identical auxiliary fuel tanks were mounted in the dry van box on each truck, and each truck was outfitted with Racelogic GPS and Rosco Video GPS data loggers. Fuel consumption was measured by weighing the full auxiliary fuel tank at the start of a run, and then weighing it again after each truck had completed the run. The difference was the amount of fuel consumed by each truck. The scale used to weigh the auxiliary fuel tanks had an accuracy of ±0.02 pounds (1/3 of an ounce).

For more details, visit www.mitfuso.com.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Boost truck leasing profits with telematics insights! Reduce maintenance costs, improve uptime, and strengthen customer relationships. Learn how data drives success.
This free guide outlines simple steps for hiring and onboarding commercial drivers while ensuring that you meet Regulation Part 391 and maintain fully compliant driver qualification...
Ready to boost fleet efficiency by up to 50%? Learn how AI-powered dispatch and next-gen tech are transforming TMS workflows, improving driver planning, and streamlining operations...
Gain a strategic edge in today’s evolving fleet landscape. Join us to explore how fuel cards are helping fleet managers cut costs, enhance control, and prepare for an electrified...