• Learn from solar, work together to reduce EV infrastructure costs

    Folks involved in building the electric vehicle infrastructure can take advantage of lessons learned in the solar industry. Though, the soft costs of the charging infrastructure are not fully understood and can be hard to quantify.
    April 1, 2020
    3 min read
    Photo: Flikr
    Solar Panels 5e848bec8b00c

    Folks involved in building the electric vehicle infrastructure can take advantage of lessons learned in the solar industry. According to a new report, Reducing Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Costs, from our partner Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI), streamlining the process and reducing bottlenecks is a good way to keep costs down.

    The report says that hardware costs are already coming down, but “soft costs” still need to be understood, addressed and reduced. For more information on electric truck charging, see NACFE’s guidance published last year – Amping Up: Charging Infrastructure for Electric Trucks.

    The report classifies infrastructure costs into three main areas:

    • Procurement — This includes charger hardware, managed charging capability, contracts, software, grid hosting capacity, and make-ready infrastructure.
    • Requirements — This includes payment system, measurement standards compliance, ADA compliance and parking requirements, dual plug types for DCFC and cost standards.
    • Soft costs — This includes communication between utilities and providers, future proofing, easement process and complex codes and permitting processes.

    The soft costs of the charging infrastructure are not fully understood and can be hard to quantify. The solar industry found that when a variety of groups — Department of Energy, U.S. national laboratories and non-government organizations — worked together they were able to identify problem areas. Once the problems were identified, these groups and others worked together cooperatively to solve them.

    It was estimated that soft costs represented 65% of the total cost of solar infrastructure. While RMI says there is not enough data to determine what percentage soft costs are of EV infrastructure costs, the organization would not be surprised if the percentage was similar to that of solar.

    In the report, RMI identified some obvious areas for soft cost reduction:

    • Procure in larger volumes
    • Coordinate and consolidate charging sites
    • Choose sites carefully and consider conduit run
    • Plan for the future
    • Unbundle procurement
    • Install charging infrastructure during construction
    • Procure shorter data plans
    • Use standard RFPs
    • Offer focused utility support
    • Expedite permitting
    • Consider wired communication
    • Communicate and standardize ADA compliance requirements
    • Promote managed charging

    You can see from this list that there are areas of improvement that touch everyone involved in making the charging infrastructure for electric vehicles a reality.

    From its inception, NACFE has been a proponent of working together with all stakeholders to solve problems and improve freight efficiency. That same cooperative model needs to be applied to reducing the soft costs associated with EV infrastructure development. Let’s all work together to help make EV charging cost effective sooner rather than later.

    I encourage you to read the report for more details on what RMI thinks is needed to bring these costs down.

    About the Author

    Michael Roeth

    Executive Director

    Michael Roeth is the executive director of the North American Council for Freight Efficiency. He serves on the second National Academy of Sciences Committee on Technologies and Approaches for Reducing the Fuel Consumption of Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicles and has held various positions with Navistar and Behr/Cummins.

    Voice your opinion!

    To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

    Sign up for our free eNewsletters

    Latest from IdeaXchange

    327892067 | Vitpho | Dreamstime.com
    fleet shop safety
    Shop safety should be as important to fleet management as driver safety, and they should reinforce their commitment to maintaining a safe working environment for all.
    235064334 | Welcomia | Dreamstime.com
    diesel tech retention
    Retaining diesel technicians requires a multifaceted approach that goes beyond traditional compensation strategies.
    346047 | Aaron Kohr | Dreamstime.com
    extending asset lifecycles
    By extending asset life cycles strategically, organizations can mitigate financial risks associated with fleet management while maintaining operational efficiency.