• UAW strikes Navistar

    More than 4,000 UAW members at 11 local unions in six states went on strike against Navistar Tuesday at 5 p.m
    Oct. 24, 2007
    3 min read
    Image

    More than 4,000 UAW members at 11 local unions in six states went on strike against Navistar Tuesday at 5 p.m. The strike against Navistar, holding company for International Truck & Engine Corp., highlights the growing and contentious issue of cost reduction as U.S. manufacturers seek ways to improve competitiveness.

    The primary impetus for the strike was Navistar’s relocation of a portion of its truck production out of unionized U.S. plants to non-union facilities in Texas and Mexico. “International Truck and Engine has shredded our agreement, shipped our work out of the country, and trampled our nation’s labor laws,” noted UAW President Ron Gettelfinger.

    The UAW represents employees at nine International Truck and Engine facilities: Indianapolis, IN (engine assembly and foundry), Melrose Park, IL (engine assembly and engine engineering), Springfield, OH (truck assembly), Atlanta, GA, York, PA, Dallas, TX (parts distribution centers) and Fort Wayne, IN (truck engineering).

    Navistar, however, sees this as an issue of competitiveness. “Changes we’ve proposed are already in place at other UAW-represented manufacturers in our industry,” said Jeff Bowen, International’s vp-human resources, on Oct. 4 when the union broke off contract negotiations. Bowen said the company and union engaged in various periods of negotiations for more than two years, attempting to reach agreement on changes that would improve the competitiveness of International’s UAW-represented facilities.

    Bowen said International’s proposals would maintain a good quality of life for employees and retirees and improve non-competitive issues at its union plants.

    Competitiveness and cost reduction were at the heart of labor deals the UAW struck with General Motors earlier this year, also after holding a two-day national strike against the automaker.

    As part of its deal with the UAW, GM wanted to cut or erase what it said is about a $25-per-hour labor cost disparity with its Japanese competitors. The OEM got most of what it needed, shifting the majority of its $51- billion un-funded retiree health care obligation to a UAW-run trust. The union will invest the money and take over the health care responsibility for about 340,000 GM hourly retirees and spouses.

    According to JP Morgan analyst Himanshu Patel, quoted by Reuters, GM could eventually save up to $5 billion annually under the terms of what he called a “clearly transformational” four-year labor deal. This would allow GM to offer buyouts to UAW workers and then hire new workers at a sharply lower cost of $26 per hour, compared to the $78 per hour it pays for current employees, saving $1.8 billion annually by 2011.

    About the Author

    Sean Kilcarr

    Editor in Chief

    Sean Kilcarr is a former longtime FleetOwner senior editor who wrote for the publication from 2000 to 2018. He served as editor-in-chief from 2017 to 2018.

     

    Voice your opinion!

    To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

    Sign up for our free eNewsletters

    Latest from Operations

    Brakebush Transportation
    Brakebush Transportation was awarded the 2025 FleetOwner Private Fleet of the Year Award, sponsored by Descartes, for midsize operations.
    Members Only
    Leaders of Brakebush Transportation, a century-old family business, share some of their innovative strategies and deep commitments to drivers that earned their operation FleetOwner...
    Schneider
    schneider 90th anniversary
    Schneider hosted an anniversary event, honoring a legacy that began in 1935 and grew to 12,500 trucks today.
    346047 | Aaron Kohr | Dreamstime.com
    extending asset lifecycles
    By extending asset life cycles strategically, organizations can mitigate financial risks associated with fleet management while maintaining operational efficiency.