• Can Local Governments Set More Stringent Engine Pollution Restrictions?

    The Supreme Court Wednesday heard arguments in a case that will decide whether the South Coast Air Quality Management District can impose anti-smog restrictions for city buses, airport shuttles and other vehicles more stringent than the federal Clean Air Act. The decision could have nationwide implications, allowing local governments to set higher pollution standards and making some engines unusable
    Jan. 15, 2004
    2 min read
    The Supreme Court Wednesday heard arguments in a case that will decide whether the South Coast Air Quality Management District can impose anti-smog restrictions for city buses, airport shuttles and other vehicles more stringent than the federal Clean Air Act.

    The decision could have nationwide implications, allowing local governments to set higher pollution standards and making some engines unusable in their areas.

    The rules, adopted in 2000 and 2001 by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, were intended to replace local government diesel-fueled buses, street sweepers, trash trucks and airport shuttles with cleaner-burning models.

    Counsel for the clean air agency argued that it was within its legal authority to impose stricter rules to improve air quality. Seth Waxman, representing the district, told justices the rules don't conflict with federal regulations, because they do not force manufacturers to change emission standards. They merely give guidance to fleet operators to buy cleaner-burning vehicles that are already on the market. He told the court: "They [the rules] cannot be read to require manufacturers to make anything they don't make.”

    Lawyers for oil companies and diesel engine makers contend that local pollution rules in this instance conflict with the federal Clean Air Act and that federal law must prevail. Lawyers for the Engine Manufacturers Association Engine Manufacturers Association and the Western States Petroleum Association said that there would be chaos if each state or every local jurisdiction set its own standard.

    Several industry groups involved with transportation joined EMA and WSPA in bringing the case to the Supreme Court including the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, American Petroleum Institute, American Trucking Associations, National Petrochemical Refiners Association, National Manufacturers Association, National Automobile Dealers Association, Truck Manufacturers Association and the United States Chamber of Commerce.

    The air quality district covers parts of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties and is supported by the National League of Cities, other local government agencies and 16 states.

    The case is Engine Manufacturers Association v. South Coast Air Quality Management District.

    Voice your opinion!

    To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

    Sign up for our free eNewsletters

    Latest from News

    Yevheniia Ryzhova | Dreamstime.com
    Why Clear Communication is Key to Retaining Happy, Motivated Drivers
    Drivers want to be seen. Supported. Heard. And they can tell when it’s genuine and when it’s just for show.
    J.B. Poindexter & Co.
    DCBM brand ambulances
    Parent company of work truck upfitting giants Reading Truck and Morgan Olson expands into the emergency vehicle market with the addition of one of North America’s largest ambulance...
    Oxy
    Occidental Chemical, known as OxyChem, produces indispensable chemicals internationally. This small private fleet covers about 2.5 million miles annually, delivering products to customers across the U.S.
    Members Only
    Leadership and training turned this chemical bulk hauler into one of the safest fleets in the U.S. Intensive training and experience pay off for Oxy's Occidental Chemical transportation...