Can Local Governments Set More Stringent Engine Pollution Restrictions?

Jan. 15, 2004
The Supreme Court Wednesday heard arguments in a case that will decide whether the South Coast Air Quality Management District can impose anti-smog restrictions for city buses, airport shuttles and other vehicles more stringent than the federal Clean Air Act. The decision could have nationwide implications, allowing local governments to set higher pollution standards and making some engines unusable
The Supreme Court Wednesday heard arguments in a case that will decide whether the South Coast Air Quality Management District can impose anti-smog restrictions for city buses, airport shuttles and other vehicles more stringent than the federal Clean Air Act.

The decision could have nationwide implications, allowing local governments to set higher pollution standards and making some engines unusable in their areas.

The rules, adopted in 2000 and 2001 by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, were intended to replace local government diesel-fueled buses, street sweepers, trash trucks and airport shuttles with cleaner-burning models.

Counsel for the clean air agency argued that it was within its legal authority to impose stricter rules to improve air quality. Seth Waxman, representing the district, told justices the rules don't conflict with federal regulations, because they do not force manufacturers to change emission standards. They merely give guidance to fleet operators to buy cleaner-burning vehicles that are already on the market. He told the court: "They [the rules] cannot be read to require manufacturers to make anything they don't make.”

Lawyers for oil companies and diesel engine makers contend that local pollution rules in this instance conflict with the federal Clean Air Act and that federal law must prevail. Lawyers for the Engine Manufacturers Association Engine Manufacturers Association and the Western States Petroleum Association said that there would be chaos if each state or every local jurisdiction set its own standard.

Several industry groups involved with transportation joined EMA and WSPA in bringing the case to the Supreme Court including the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, American Petroleum Institute, American Trucking Associations, National Petrochemical Refiners Association, National Manufacturers Association, National Automobile Dealers Association, Truck Manufacturers Association and the United States Chamber of Commerce.

The air quality district covers parts of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties and is supported by the National League of Cities, other local government agencies and 16 states.

The case is Engine Manufacturers Association v. South Coast Air Quality Management District.

Sponsored Recommendations

Reducing CSA Violations & Increasing Safety With Advanced Trailer Telematics

Keep the roads safer with advanced trailer telematics. In this whitepaper, see how you can gain insights that lead to increased safety and reduced roadside incidents—keeping drivers...

80% Fewer Towable Accidents - 10 Key Strategies

After installing grille guards on all of their Class 8 trucks, a major Midwest fleet reported they had reduced their number of towable accidents by 80% post installation – including...

Proactive Fleet Safety: A Guide to Improved Efficiency and Profitability

Each year, carriers lose around 32.6 billion vehicle hours as a result of weather-related congestion. Discover how to shift from reactive to proactive, improve efficiency, and...

Tackling the Tech Shortage: Lessons in Recruiting Talent and Reducing Turnover

Discover innovative strategies for recruiting and retaining tech talent in the trucking industry at our April 16th webinar, where experts will share insights on competitive pay...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!