Post Office asks for HOS exemption

Jan. 1, 2006
Efficiency concerns have prompted the United States Postal Service (USPS) to ask FMCSA to allow some of its contract motor carriers to work under the HOS rules that were in effect prior to January 4, 2004. If granted, this exemption could have a far-reaching impact since the mail delivery giant holds about 5,100 contracts with motor carriers nationwide. According to a USPS spokesman, to his knowledge

Efficiency concerns have prompted the United States Postal Service (USPS) to ask FMCSA to allow some of its contract motor carriers to work under the HOS rules that were in effect prior to January 4, 2004. If granted, this exemption could have a far-reaching impact since the mail delivery giant holds about 5,100 contracts with motor carriers nationwide. According to a USPS spokesman, to his knowledge the operation has never before requested such an exemption.

In an e-mailed statement, USPS spokesman Robert A. Anderson told FLEET OWNER:

“The new rules would require changes to many existing highway contract route schedules. USPS believes altering its processing operations would be tenuous and infeasible, and changing the affected highway contract route schedules would be costly and complicated.

One disruptive portion of the rules is the prohibition of stopping the operators' driving clocks when they take a break. This would allow for fewer miles to be covered by an operator under the highway contract route schedules currently in place.

Given the rigid time schedules of USPS mail processing operations, the revised rules would require more drivers and, in some cases, unique highway transportation operations in order for the mail to arrival/depart on time.

USPS expects that operating under the old rule will achieve an equal, if not better, level of safety than if the new rules were followed, “based on the fact that contracted drivers operate per a reasonable schedule.”

The American Postal Workers Union (APWU), which represents over 330,000 USPS employees, warned that there could be serious safety implications if the request is approved.

“Drivers would have very long standby time under the extended-hours tours, which is likely to impact highway safety and even the safety of residential streets,” stated the union. “The hours-of-service were reduced because study after study showed that fatigue is a major factor in highway accidents involving heavy trucks.”

To view the application notice in the Federal Register, go to http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.ac cess.gpo.gov/2005/05-22648.htm.

About the Author

TERRENCE NGUYEN

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Leveraging telematics to get the most from insurance

Fleet owners are quickly adopting telematics as part of their risk mitigation strategy. Here’s why.

Reliable EV Charging Solution for Last-Mile Delivery Fleets

Selecting the right EV charging infrastructure and the right partner to best solve your needs are critical. Learn which solution PepsiCo is choosing to power their fleet and help...

Overcoming Common Roadblocks Associated with Fleet Electrification at Scale

Fleets in the United States, are increasingly transitioning from internal combustion engine vehicles to electric vehicles. While this shift presents challenges, there are strategies...

Report: The 2024 State of Heavy-Duty Repair

From capitalizing on the latest revenue trends to implementing strategic financial planning—this report serves as a roadmap for navigating the challenges and opportunities of ...